Back Five Common Misunderstandings About Nonprofit Marketing

Marketing became part of the nonprofit world's lexicon during the 1990's, but many Board of Directors and staff decision-makers admit they aren't confident that they really know what it means.

This occurs in large nonprofits as well as smaller ones. When the American Red Cross completed its first year of a "market positioning project" in the mid-90's, a quick poll of chapter executives captured an array of definitions of marketing. Many of them will be familiar to other nonprofit leaders:
  • "It's TV, radio, newspapers – letting people know what we're about."
  • "It's fundraising...getting there first."
  • "It's selling ourselves."
  • "It's letting people know about the services we deliver."
One savvy chapter executive had a broader definition: "It's our image, publicity, the knowledge the public has about our products and services. It's asking the public what would be helpful, developing products in response and delivering them, and then going out and finding how we're doing."

That layman's definition is better than some academic ones. A careful reading of it will keep most organizations from these five common misunderstandings about nonprofit marketing.
  1. Marketing is today's term for fundraising.

    Perhaps your organization gets income from an affinity card and has a corporate sponsor for your annual conference – as well as the usual revenue producers such as membership dues, foundation grants, and publication sales. Does this mean you are marketing? Not necessarily – though it does mean you are diversifying your income sources.

    Although increased revenue is often a beneficial outcome of successful nonprofit marketing, it is a mistake to think of marketing simply as an updated way of talking about fundraising.

  2. Marketing means publicity, especially in the news media.

    Greater public visibility, through news media exposure and other means, is sometimes an important element of marketing. But it is only one element. It is important to remember that successful marketing can occur in the absence of getting the organization's name in the newspaper.

  3. Marketing is selling people your programs.

    Wrong. Marketing is selling people their programs, the ones that meet their needs. One reason the marketing orientation is so hard to inculcate into the nonprofit culture is because it turns on its head the familiar nonprofit orientation of knowing what someone needs without ever asking him.

    Marketing is based on asking people – some nonprofits say customers – what they want and delivering it within the confines of organizational mission and goals. Few nonprofits are oriented that way. Most were started by visionaries who, acting on perceived but often unarticulated needs of a population, were able to package a program to meet those needs. The very packaging helped the population understand its need and articulate it. However, past the visionary start-up phase, "knowing what the client needs" is an unproductive attitude because it blinds an organization to the necessity of asking what he or she needs.

  4. Marketing is about messages, not programs and services.

    Wrong again. Marketing is not just the message an organization conveys, it is also the program that it delivers. Any plan that does not evaluate the relevance of an organization's current crop of programs and services to its intended clientele is not a marketing plan. It may be a public relations plan, a fundraising strategy, a membership drive, or something else – but it is not a marketing plan.

  5. We're not having fundraising problems, so we don't need marketing.

    Marketing is a process of linking people with needs and people who can meet those needs. In the nonprofit world, it may involve an exchange of money or it may not. A marketing plan can be developed for recruiting more volunteers or volunteers with different skills. One can be developed for recruiting more clients to the programs. One could even be developed for establishing relationships with government policy-makers.

I use this decidedly non-academic definition of marketing with many clients because it helps them see the broader applicability of this discipline: marketing is putting the right information into the hands of the right people to get them to take the action you want them to take.

This definition is a working tool for developing a marketing approach. To use it, start at the end of the sentence and work back to the beginning. The questions to answer, in order, are these:
  • What is our goal? What do we want to have happen? (Action)
  • Who can make this happen? Who must take action? (The "right people" constitute the target audience.)
  • What will motivate them to take that action? (The "right information" is the persuasive message, based on their self-interest.)
  • What are the most effective ways to reach them? ("Putting" the information in the hands of the audience is the delivery system.)
This definition is easy to understand and should be easy to use. It is often hard to use, however, because boards and executives veer off from their area of expertise – knowing what the organization's goal is – and spend their time discussing everything else. In fact, once organizational leaders define what they want to have happen, marketing professionals should be brought in to help identify target audiences, design messages, and select appropriate delivery systems.

However, marketing professionals cannot make the fundamental decision: what specific action the organization wants to promote. As in so many areas of nonprofit management, this decision is the essential first step in developing a marketing strategy.

©Rebecca K. Leet. Adapted from an article in Strategic Governance for Nonprofit Executives and Boards, July 1995.
 
  Copyright © 2003 Rebecca Leet & Associates. All Rights Reserved. Contact Us